post

Is Judge Sherry Stephens Part of the Hughes Mormon Coverup?

Chris and Sky Hughes

Ponzi Scheme Liars Chris and Sky Hughes – Click to enlarge

Over the past 3 to  4 months, many have been wondering why Judge Sherry Stephens has been so “prosecution-friendly”, letting short-man Rock Star Juan Martinez get away with just about anything he wants to get away with in court.  It’s okay for Juan to scream at witnesses, make facial gestures, flail his arms, pound tables, throw papers around, and throw pens at witnesses without being admonished or thrown in jail.  It’s part of the reason Jose Baez has admitted that Juan Martinez has lost the jury.

Surely, many can recall when Judge Belvin Perry threw Matthew Bartlett in jail for 6 days for flipping Jeff Ashton (the laughing prosecutor) the bird.  However Belvin Perry continued to allow Jeff Ashton to laugh and even did so himself, without throwing Ashton (or himself) in the Orange County jail.

So now Sherry Stephens let’s the arrogant and defiant Martinez get away with all of his courtroom antics. 

Chris & Sky Hughes are a pair of lying dishonest jerks — and in that regard, they’re a perfect match for each other.

So when it came to the trial, they were ultimately faced with these 2 distinct choices:

[1] Helping Jodi by confirming Travis’ mental & physical abuse of Jodi AND other women, together with their knowledge of his pedophilia-related antics and his “age of attraction”, or …

[2] Helping themselves by flat out denying everything they know, and denying everything they discussed in their email exchanges with Travis (aka “lying”).

It must have been a very difficult decision to make, but they ultimately decided to help themselves and, in turn, keep all their Mormon chums happy.  After all, why would they want to tell the truth about con man Travis (and help Jodi) when it wouldn’t benefit them socially or financially?

Chris Hughes already confirmed he’s firmly on the prosecution’s side, so sure he’s gonna do all he can to fly the flag for them, including stating to the media (on behalf of Martinez) that the TA letters were forged – even though he knows they were not. He knows, having seen some of them, that they’re genuine. He even wrote to TA to tell him he wasn’t treating Jodi right.

The email exchanges also specifically discussed TA’s “age of attraction” when it comes to children, which (as far as I recall) Sky was somewhat surprised at. This ties together the earlier pedophile rumors pertaining to TA and his preference for pigtails & 12 years old’s, does it not?

In fact both Chris & Sky Hughes emailed Travis telling him he was being abusive to Jodi back in 2007. This started to come out again in Alyce LaViolette’s direct testimony – despite repeated & futile objections from Martinez.

Unfortunately, we now know that Sky Hughes confessed that she wouldn’t let Travis date her own sister due to his violent history with ex girlfriends.  And according to the USA Today, the Hughes coverup is more apparent:

What was not mentioned in court Thursday was the history of the emails. A defense filing from January 2011 details the efforts Arias’ attorneys went to obtain them. Initially the prosecution told the defense attorneys that there were no available text messages sent or received by Alexander and then was ordered to turn over several hundred.

Furthermore, according to the filing, the case agent, Mesa police Detective Esteban Flores, told the defense attorneys that there was nothing “out of the ordinary” among Alexander’s emails; about 8,000 were turned over to the defense in June 2010, including the Hughes emails.

The 2011 filing details the email contents, including “A response from Mr. Hughes … wherein he asserts that he believes Jodi would be his (Travis’) next victim and that Jodi was just another girl that he (Travis) was playing.” Alexander allegedly replied by saying “I am a bit of a sociopath.”

Other emails from Sky Hughes, the filing says, say that Alexander considered Arias to be a “booty call,” and said “How he, Mr. Alexander, was abusive to Jodi and … how he was beating her emotionally in part by making out with her without giving her a commitment.” And there is an email from another woman Alexander was seeing at the time “wherin she complains of Mr. Alexander’s conduct making her feel used and dirty.”

How much of those emails make it into testimony remains to be seen. Chris and Sky Hughes have already testified for the prosecution regarding an earlier allegation of misconduct by Martinez, but the topic of the emails was not discussed. They could be called back.

Watch THIS video:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Jason Weber
Founder of Occupy HLN. Hockey player-turned-professional. Graduate of Cornell University's Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management '97. Sports fanatic, enjoy networking, and keeping up with current events. Technocrat, Schema, SEO, blogaholic, social media contributor, Stack Exchange contributor, and keeping up with G's daily algorithmic alterations.
Jason Weber

@occupyhln

Protecting your constitutional civil rights of due process from yellow journalism, the trial-by-media lynch-mob, & the prison lobby http://t.co/URLVOoNmvG
Is America progressing or regressing? Not sure? Check out Regressive Watch! And even if you think you're sure,... http://t.co/vxK27oSWNi - 1 hour ago
Jason Weber
Jason Weber

Comments

  1. Sandra Webber says

    Exactly, Jason! I’m going to post this on my site, and take all credit…ha…kidding! Yeah, those two make my skin crawl!

    • says

      Yes, you have to be prudent with Fascistbook. I’ve been able to escape their punishments, but many get banned for a week or 60 days; it’s quite common. Just make a temporary FB account for a week, and then when you’re unbanned, go back to your regular account.

      ~ Jason

      • Sandra Webber says

        Yeah, I’m learning. Ever hear of a site called “rapebook”? The name is misleading, but it was started by a woman trying to clean up the misogynistic sites and other horribly violent threatening sites, etc. It’s actually not active anymore, but still up. Anyway, what I came here to say, was that if it weren’t for the Hughes, Travis would be alive today. And probably married to a non Mormon girl, the one he supposedly had bought a ring for, and who gave him a choice to either stay in school and marry her, or if he went with Pre-Paid legal, it was over……I’m sure the Hughes high pressured him, pushed him to be maybe something he never was, and as it came crashing down, they saw Jodi as the perfect scapegoat. Who knows just how deeply they are involved. I’m guessing really, really deep.

        • says

          I am beginning to think Travis only used women as a front. I find something funny about all his exs. They were nice yes, but they all left him a little to easy like they left with some kind of understanding but remained friends. He wanted a wife to make him look good imo.

    • Milan McCandle says

      Same here. Not banned, but my posts, no matter what they are continually removed. For example, someone posted a really nice post on HLN about how they are the stalkers, etc., and my comment was, BRAVO, BRAVO etc. – it was removed. That was last night.
      I also had 4 other innocuous posts removed.
      Censorship of anything they don’t like, any opinions that dissent.

  2. Moonshade says

    Are you watching the same trial?? The defense has lost the jury. They aren’t buying the bs that the defense is selling. Jodi is a cold hearted brutal animal who premeditated the savage killing of Travis Alexander who, aside from insults to her (rightfully so) never, ever based Jodi. The evidence shows the opposite in fact; Jodi was the abuser. Jodi was the stalker. Jodi was the one who stabbed Travis 28 times, shot him and slit his throat to the point it almost was cut off! This is not self defense no matter how you spin it!

    Jodi Arias is an evil creature and Karma will bite her soon!!

    • says

      The prosecution has lost the jury. They’re not buying the bs premeditation Rock Star really lost the jury with his antics. But aside from his outrageous antics, the evidence points to the fact that there was a struggle — no premeditation. That’s unless Jodi wanted to get beat up again before killing him. The experts clearly say Travis was the abuser. Perhaps more importantly, Travis’ own best friends say he was the abuser. So I guess you’re smarter than all of them.

      And please, the 28 times ad-hominem stuff may work with some people, but I know what a fugue state is, and she was in a fugue state. So you can’t say it was premeditated just ’cause she stabbed him. You’re using emotion instead of intellect — exactly the type of juror that shouldn’t be in a trial. Follow the evidence — NOT HLN. As I say in the post,http://www.occupyhln.org/jodi-arias-case/jose-baez-juan-martinez-has-lost-the-jury/ … the evidence proves there wasn’t premeditation.

      • DaniD says

        Jason….your an idiot….and I want my 2 minutes back that I wasted reading this bs….LMAO….seriously you are on another planet with this garbage your spewing…were you dropped on your head as a child? Come on back to reality now….it’s safe :) promise…but you can’t bring your friend Jodi…sorry but she’s deemed a psychopath, that’s just the cold hard truth…

      • TheLiterateType says

        Guess you were wrong huh? Considering the Jury more than agreed with the Prosecutor and are now deciding whether to give Arias death.

    • says

      Stalker? You say evidence ,where is any evidence she stalked him? All hearsay that no one by the way witnessed. Yea right she crawled through the doggie dog= are you kidding me? She had the number to the key pad to get in. Who that knew Jodi testified to her being cold hearted? I think I heard she was shy . You say this is not self defense. The evidence was Travis speaking, to Jodi , to the Hughes, on his blogs. Oh Travis had a voice in this trial= we heard it remember. All this crap he could not speak for his self is crap = we all heard him speak. If a profiler had walked in on that scence they would have said this was a crime of passion. Jodi snapped that day and the over kill shows that . And the Jodi we have seen since that day is the one that lost herself that day.

      • TheLiterateType says

        How about the evidence of OVERKILL, you know the 29 stabs, slitting his throat, and shooting him in the head? I’m sorry is that not enough for you? Who gives a flying crap if she stalked him. Obviously the Jury didn’t because they convicted her. She BRUTALLY MURDERED an individual. Is there PROOF he was abusive? No!! Is there PROOF he was a pedophile? No!! Is their Proof she brutally killed him? YES!! She even admits it and in her plea for her life today even says “It is the worst mistake of my life” that came out of HER mouth.

    • says

      There’s no question. No judge in any state would allow Rock Star to get away with his antics without admonishing him and holding him in contempt. As if throwing pens and papers isn’t enough, or cutting witnesses off in the middle of their testimony isn’t enough, raising your voice and finger-pointing, Rock Star knows that posing for photo ops and signing autographs will be seen by jurors.

      He also knows every one of those jurors watches television shows they’re not supposed to be watching when they get home. That’s why Sherry Stephens guaranteed an appeal before the trial even started by not sequestering the jury. She’s either corrupt or as bright as a 20 watt light bulb. You decide. It really makes Arizona look bad. Being our 3rd youngest state, it’s making a mockery of our judicial system. And HLN is taking full advantage of this malfeasance, pouncing on it like a cat would a mouse.

      ~ Jason

  3. DaniD says

    Jason….your an idiot….and I want my 2 minutes back that I wasted reading this bs….LMAO….seriously you are on another planet with this garbage your spewing…were you dropped on your head as a child? Come on back to reality now….it’s safe :) promise…but you can’t bring your friend Jodi…sorry but she’s deemed a psychopath, that’s just the cold hard truth…

    • cb says

      DaniD, I’m sorry to say, but you sound like a sociopath. Are you kidding me? All the evidence has been in our faces and you choose to ignore it like the sick Mormon people and the crooked justice system. You are one of those evil people who just like HLN and all the folks who were standing in front of the courthouse laughing and crying over the verdict like sick maniacs who can’t wait to see bloodshed. You are no better than the crime Jodi committed. Void of any kind of feelings for others and just plain evil who continue to ignore the facts. You DaniD are a sheeple! You are a follower with absolutely no conscience whatsoever!

  4. Erin Mack says

    First of all Sandra, your “Shooting Juan” video was a bit too much for me, but your
    subsequent explanation of your thought process and reasoning behind making it
    was well thought out and changed my perception a bit. You are here agreeing
    with a man that still insists that Juan Martinez, on the FIRST day of cross,
    proceeded to cross LaV for 4 hours. Please don’t. I fear for your “career.” I
    am still waiting for you to cite that source Jason. Secondly, Travis liked to
    have sex. Jodi was a freak. Travis was a freak. They liked to have freaky,
    fun sex behind closed doors. Good for them! Chris and Sky WERE concerned when
    they received information from the DEFENSE, in which Nurmi told them Travis was
    a pedophile and he had IRREFUTABLE evidence. Evidence that was NON ADMISSIBLE
    because it was not irrefutable. Maybe Matt should have, cut, copied and pasted
    a little bit better. I too, would FLIP out, having 5 kiddos myself if I got
    word from a lawyer opposite side or not, telling me my best friend was into
    kids.

    Chris’ sent Travis an email about his age of consent, due to comments made by Jodi. Do you know what those comments were? Perhaps she pushed home the fact that he liked her to wear braids and dress up like a school girl. Which is a good time actually. Or maybe it was the Spidey’s? Did Jodi bring those up claiming them to be “boys”
    underwear? Let me give you a little tidbit of info. I don’t think she got them
    for V’day. They would have been in the picture with the HORRIBLE excuse for
    professionally lettered trash she said he gave her to claim ownership. That
    type of shit SELLS LIKE HOTCAKES. See I made my own: http://www.cafepress.com/cp/customize/product2.aspx?from=CustomDesigner&number=841345073
    so anyone can make that which could mean she did and thus make up the whole
    Valentine’s Day package scenario including the LITTLE BOYS SPIDEY’S

    Aaaaanyway, back to the Spidey’s. If you recall Jodi said that the size was a 5
    or a 6. Here’s the thing. Before Jodi became a jailbird she had a few more lbs.
    packed onto her cute little self. She said that the waist fit, but she had to
    cut the legs to pull them up. To that I say EEEEEEEEEEENT WRONG-O! I have a 5
    and a 6 year old boy and there is NO WAY that she got those “little boys”
    underwear up over her ass even if she cut the legs open. Why? Well let’s have
    another visual, shall we? http://www.walmart.com/ip/Batman-Lego-Boys-5-Piece-Underwear-Set/20216827?_mm=#Specifications

    Under the size, select 6, and then under that there is a “size chart” you can click on… she would have to have a 21 inch waist to get those to fit and splitting the legs open doesn’t negate the fact that she would have to PULL THEM UP OVER HER ASS. NOT
    HAPPENING. Now let’s go with the fact that he may have given her normal adult
    boy shorts. They do exist. And a size 6 would fit her nicely. http://walyou.com/geek-underwear/ she twisted this around to fit in with all of the other bullshit she skewed to spin the pedo tale. Sky trusted Nurmi, because most people don’t say they have evidence of such a thing when they don’t. Those Spidey’s were for a little adult time fun. I have a pair and they are cute as hell and my husband is not a pedophile. If you are going to try and claim pedo based on the details she gave and the actual specifications of boy’s undies, it doesn’t match up. I have no doubt there were Spiderman Undies somewhere in the mix. But I bet SHE brought them in and she got them from a site or a store for WOMEN.

    Onto other issues. This comment you made above: “Other emails from Sky Hughes, the filing says, say that Alexander considered Arias to be a “booty call,” and said “How
    he, Mr. Alexander, was abusive to Jodi and … how he was beating her emotionally
    in part by making out with her without giving her a commitment.” Look at the language
    used, they cared about her getting abused EMOTIONALLY due to him KISSING her
    and not giving a commitment. This all while Jodi was still playing Good Mormon
    Jodi. Travis was a bit of a player, and only a Mormon would use that
    description due to their religious beliefs. And it is possible that they viewed the way he played woman to be “abusive” due to the constraints of their faith. I believe that they sent those emails to Jodi because they were still seeing “Nice Mormon Girl Jodi” at this point, and thought perhaps with the MAJOR importance of the laws of chastity to her, that it would be best for her to move on to someone that isn’t going to challenge that… But
    then Jodi started coming on a little too strong, all this time they still like
    her, but she begins to change a bit… she starts asking Sky TONS of questions
    about Travis. And it all ends one night when she is caught eavesdropping on a
    conversation that Chris and Sky were having with Travis about their misgivings
    about Jodi. All of those nice girl qualities and chats and emails went right
    out the door with one look from Jodi. ONE LOOK and Travis was told she was
    unwelcome in their house ever again or never allowed around their kids again.
    ONE LOOK was all it took to wash away the “warm fuzzies” and “protectiveness”
    they had for Jodi. So that’s that. Little did they know that Jodi and Travis
    were already at it like rabbits and role playing with the best of them.

    Travis was in trouble within the Mormon community and I quote from Chris Hughes himself:

    “Travis messed up, and he knew it! It’s not “If” Travis had a disciplinary
    council- he did! And he was disfellowshipped. I spoke to my Father-in-law, who
    has been a Bishop 5 times, and he was not surprised that he had not been
    excommunicated. He said those councils are guided by inspiration, and based on
    the heart of the sinner, and their willingness to repent. Travis was miserable-
    in total turmoil. I have seen Jodi manipulate people- good people, and they had
    no clue what was going on. Travis didn’t see what we saw, and refused to think
    she was anything but sweet.

    In April, or near, of 2007, we told her we didn’t want her in our home again, and that we wanted nothing to do with her because of an experience we had with her. I have never felt such an evil spirit in all my life, never before nor since, that night we decided she was no longer welcome. Travis was not dealing with a “normal” person. She wanted to
    marry him, and she was going to do whatever it took to have him…or no one
    would. Travis had been talking to his Bishop, and had taken care of everything
    at the “Stake” level. He was NOT excommunicated. And was not keeping
    all of this a huge secret. Travis was living outside of his values, he knew it,
    and he was ashamed of it. His closest friends were aware if what was going on,
    and so was his Bishop and Stake President. He was excited about Jodi leaving so
    he could get his life back on track, and living according to his beliefs. There
    is a big difference between having a “secret” life and a
    “private” life! We all have private lives.’’

    This is a man that wanted to find his way back to his God. But you all are so quick to find that laughable because he was weak in doing so. I am sure that you have weaknesses too, like truth in your “journalism”. There is no hiding here. No one is sweeping anything under the rug. Because all this does is further prove one fact Travis had issues with
    morality when it came to sex and Jodi. She was a drug to him and he was the
    same to her. You start out your article getting after Juan the “Rock Star”.
    Nothing new really. I get that he angers you. I could see why he would rub some
    the wrong way. But even this is a stretch to accuse the judge of keeping Mormon
    secrets. My great Grandfather in-law is Mormon. You go after people that have
    stood fast for a friend. I would hope that you have a few friends that would
    hold fast for you. You have to look at all of the context before you can judge.
    There were reasons that the Hughes’ did what they did, each time they made a
    decision. All of the questions that were posed to Travis by Chris and Sky were
    brought about by the actions of a lawyer with a bullshit story or a psychopath
    with an agenda.

    *P.S. – Lots of people enjoy your posts, they provide hours of laughter
    and entertainment and also spur discussions about mental health.*

    • DianeDakota says

      The LDS councils that are inspired by inspiration??? What laugh! I was born and raised in Utah and have Mormon relatives. You are talking about a “church” created by a soothsayer who got his inspiration from reading rocks and wanting to take under age girls as his wife. This nutcase stood outside the window of a young girl’s room at night in a sheet and blew up gunpowder and spoke to her as he were angel telling her that she should marry Joseph Smith. This is a sick cult that was based on hallucinations of a sexual pervert. No wonder they have been out in force declaring another man with no sexual control a saint! It is sick.

      • Kimberly Wilmoth says

        I’m a Mormon and have been my whole life…You are an idiot…Mormonism is not a cult…Now if you want to say that FLDS is a cult, you go right ahead…But, the true LDS faith is not a cult and it’s a laughable allegation…

        • DianeDakota says

          Oh really? I am really quite educated about this and Christian churches do not recognize Mormons as a Christian faith but as a cult. I am sorry it offends you but your beliefs are foreign to Christianity on so many levels. That is a fact. If you had the facts on your side you would not have resorted to only name calling and would have proven that I was incorrect. Since it is impossible the only defense is name calling.

    • says

      you know all of you people who is judging jodi. i am not here to judge the ultimate judge is our hevenly father. wheather she did it in self defense or not my main concern is that she did not get a fair trial. i don’t care what anyone says she did not she was onvicted on speculations. gas cans (not against the law) which means she did not break any laws. when the

      walmart lady testified she said about the cashiers. anyone that shops at walmart knows that you can not return at the cashiers everything is returned in customer service. as far as her grandmothers house been broken into and a gun that was the same as what was used to shoot ta was the same. she was never charged with that crime so that is just based on coincidence, which in my book i don’t even know how that got into evidence when she was never charged the the burglary at her grandmothers house. how can a person be convicted on speculation or better yet coincidendual, because all that was coincidentual. she got a raw deal and if you have any brains you would know because it has always been not if you commit the crime but how good you can present the case.

    • says

      Wonder why Travis only liked it in the ass? You made reasons for the Hughes saying what they did. They knew Travis better then Jodi knew Travis, some of the things they said had nothing to do with any thing she told them , but more of what they were telling her about him. And did not look to me he was doing a damn thing to work his way back to God = guess he should have tried a little sooner huh cus letting Jodi in taking pictures annd banging her up the ass did not sound ANYTHING like a man trying to work his way back to God. sounds like someone wanting to fulfilled his own desires

      • BillC says

        > Wonder why Travis only liked it in the ass?

        Actually, it was the three hole wonder who liked it in the ass. However, have you ever seen the trial pics of her veejay? You could drive a clown car into that thing and still have room to spare.

    • mechelle says

      damn u got it all figure out you should of been on the prosecution team geez i didnt know people were this involved btw did you not know that Mormons love to marry little girls??? i live in Mormon country i witness this every single day you should try h polygamist burger they actually sell them in ST. George, Utah

  5. Bhakti says

    Um…what?
    Honorable Sherry Stephens is doing a top notch job of making sure Arias doesn’t overturn her conviction (and I believe she’ll get life without parole) on Appeal.
    Do you know anything about the law, and how it works?

    • says

      Uh, yes, I know quite a bit. When you have a judge who allows prosecutors to throw pens and papers, and appear in photo ops while signing autographs, you have a corrupt system. Sherry shouldn’t be ensuring a conviction. He job is to run a fair courtroom — which she hasn’t.

      ~ Jason

      • Kimberly Wilmoth says

        You are beyond exaggerating when you talk about Juan throwing pens and papers, I mean honestly…You sound so foolish…And he wasn’t holding photo ops…He wasn’t anticipating such things to happen and nothing was more obvious…He was gracious and kind, that’s all he was…Juan Martinez is FAR from wanting to be a rock star….He leads a very private life and is extremely soft spoken, kind and gentle in every day life…You sound so ridiculous.

    • says

      Really what do you call it when his exs were allowed to get up there and talk about her stalking him= never witnessed or anything just plain hearsay.. But she would not allow emails in because there were condidered hear say., She never one time corrected the toad when he was plain out attacking the witnesses. Big news flash she should have.

  6. Bhakti says

    Jason–
    “OCCUPY HLN”
    Really?
    If you want fame from this trial, you’re going to have to be a bit more creative than that.

  7. MAKEMYDAY100 says

    Juan Martinez absolutely *Slam Dunked* this case against Arias today!! He was devastating in his presentation!! The jury will convict her of pre-meditated murder and she will get the “death sentence”!!!

    • says

      Judge Sugar Sherry guaranteed an appeal by not sequestering the jury, as did Rock Star Juan with all of his courtroom violations. Juan Martinez committed judicial suicide in several ways. The most obvious were the fact that he couldn’t prove the gun was stolen, and calling Alyce LaViolette — a noble therapist who has saved countless lives over decades — a “liar”. M1 and M2 are off the table. It’s now down to manslaughter or acquittal — no matter what Tabloid TV HLN says.

      ~ Jason

    • says

      Maybe but you can bet between The toad and the judge in this case there are going to be really excellent grounds for appeal . Why do you think the defense keeps asking for a mistrial? So it will all be on record.

  8. Guest says

    What a loon you are. You need to stop watching American Idol and pay attention to the trial, my friend. lol

    • says

      Thanks for the name-calling. I don’t need to resort to that because I follow the evidence. And if you don’t think Mormons consider Travis a disgrace to the church, go do your homework. The only way they can halfway recover his reputation and help restore a modicum of credibility to the church is to convict Jodi … of something.

      ~ Jason

    • Susan Baldwin says

      Lol…you ‘re wrong …DEATH penalty with a rookie judge….Martinez is the top DOGG…the man in charge….Abused the court proceedings…

  9. michelle says

    Sky NEVER said Travis was violent. She said he couldn’t commit. Now Jodi on the other hand IS extremely violent and evil.

    • Eve Brown says

      Michelle, if this is true then why are they afraid to show their emails? The emails were deemed as heresay and so could not be submitted for evidence BUT yet here are Chris and Sky Hughes as guests on all the talking head shows twisting what they said in these emails without showing us them??? I would think the fact that they are discussing them, admitting they authored them would pretty much negate the heresay allegations!! C’mon!!

  10. says

    Another “man” fooled by killer jodi’s “charms”?? Did you listen to the same evidence I did?? The gas cans, the cut fingers, the stolen gun, turning off her cell phone, getting rid of her bloody clothes. Damn man think with your big brain, not your little one.

  11. Fred says

    Hmm, let me consider, Jason or Naughty Nightmare Nancy’s Nastiness?
    Oh no I’ve been dropped on my head and picked Jason, and I don’t even know Jodi nor live in your country.
    I must remember to kill myself before you do.
    Get a grip sheeples.

  12. Eve Brown says

    I feel the same way you do Jason. None of these blood thirsty, gang mentality followers will ever be able to see it. I mean 7 people on the jury come back with 1st degree premeditated FELONY???? That is sooo ludicrous, they would have to believe both the defense AND prosecution, Jodi stole the gun from her gp AND also that she used TA gun??? Which one is it??? I do think that in time things will come out that should have come out in trial but sad to say none of the liers will be held accountable. This whole trial has been a media crucifixion from the beginning.

  13. GUEST says

    WATCH THE GOD MAKERS 1 AND 2. PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO LILLIAN LEBARON IN FILM 2, DAUGHTER OF FLDS LEADER ERVIL LEBARON. EVERYTHING WILL COME TOGETHER IF YOU DARE OPEN YOUR EYES TO THE COVERUP.

  14. GUEST says

    DaniD, do just a few searches on the corruption in Maricopa county, let alone AZ. Close your mouth, breathe through your nose, and remember to take your Focalin, K?

  15. Susan Baldwin says

    They both played a role in the TRAGEDY..JODI was now in the fight and survival for her SELF PRESERVATION…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>